Homeless in Arizona

Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk is a liar who will make up anything to support her "war on marijuana"?

From this article in the Phoenix New Times it sure sounds like Sheila Polk is a liar who will make up anything to support her "war on marijuana"

'Holly Ward, a spokeswoman for the agency, conferred with DHS officials for this article and confirmed that the DHS has no evidence that marijuana is the "cause" of any death in Arizona'

State Health Agency has No Evidence That Marijuana Killed Anyone

By Ray Stern

Friday, June 19, 2015

State Health Agency has No Evidence That Marijuana Killed Anyone

After five years of legal medical-marijuana in Arizona, health department officials say this week they have no evidence that marijuana has been the cause of any death in the state.

Nor can the same officials present to the public any supporting evidence behind a 2013 study that claims the deaths of 62 kids were "associated" with marijuana.

The study was brought into prominence this week after anti-legalization activist Sheila Polk, the four-term Yavapai County Attorney, used it to prop up her point that marijuana is dangerous.

"Safe pot? Tell that to the 62 kids who died," reads the headline on Polk's widely-published June 15 op-ed.

The op-ed received an avalanche of criticism from anti-prohibition advocates to liberal Arizona Republic columnist E.J. Montini.

To find out what health officials really know about the subject of marijuana's alleged danger to kids, New Times checked in with the Arizona Department of Health Services, which publishes the Annual Child Fatality Review that Polk mentions in her article. It turns out the state DHS has been publishing this information about deaths associated with marijuana for years, but few noticed until Polk's prominent, politicized use of it.

Polk wrote: "According to the Arizona Department of Health Services, in a study that examines all deaths in Arizona of children under the age of 18, a disturbing number of child deaths resulted from substance use. Guess which substance was the most prevalent? Not alcohol, not methamphetamine (although they were close seconds), but marijuana. In 2013, marijuana use was associated with the tragic and needless deaths of 62 children in Arizona."

True to form, Polk is only half-right — and she's putting her money on the part that's half-wrong. The "point" of mentioning the "62 kids" stat, she writes, is that "prevention, not legalization, remains the best model for addressing drug abuse."

Yet the state DHS agrees she's incorrect to write that the study reported child deaths "resulted from" marijuana.

Holly Ward, a spokeswoman for the agency, conferred with DHS officials for this article and confirmed that the DHS has no evidence that marijuana is the "cause" of any death in Arizona.

The study does report "causes" of death, like poisoning, firearms, suicide, drownings, suffocation, etc. No specific substance is listed as a cause of death in the Child Fatality Report. But because overdoses from heroin, cocaine or prescription drugs are listed as causes in other DHS literature, we asked if marijuana was listed as a cause of death anywhere by DHS. The answer, Ward said, is "no."

Polk gets the wording right in the sentence that says pot "was associated" with 62 deaths in the study. But there are significant caveats to that correlation which Polk, ever the propagandist, didn't bother to point out in her article.

DHS officials tell New Times that they can't show the public a single example of how any of the 62 deaths were considered to be "associated" with marijuana. Patient privacy laws supposedly prohibit even the most generic information about the cases from being released to the public.

"By statute, we cannot give you the background information," Ward says.

But if the public can't learn the truth about how marijuana might have been associated with any death, it's impossible to learn how such an association might contribute to a death. Preventing deaths is the whole point of the study, ostensibly.

In fact, there is good reason to think the associations are made loosely.

The data behind the annual study is compiled by about a dozen different teams of local health officials around the state, says Mary Ellen Cunningham, chief of the agency's Bureau of Women's and Children's Health, which oversees the study.

The teams use the same basic criteria to determine whether a death is "associated" with a substance like marijuana, though differences in how the criteria is applied by the individuals on the team are possible, Cunningham says. In each of the cases examined, varying supporting documents may be used — in some cases a police report may be available, while in other cases it won't be. That hodge-podge of information is sent to the state DHS to be compiled for the Child Fatality Report.

Overall, the teams studied 811 child fatalities from 2013. Sixteen percent of the deaths were from "natural" causes like cancer. Another 7 percent of deaths were from an undetermined cause. Accidents were responsible for about 50 percent of the deaths. Officials found only 38 percent were "preventable." If that holds true for marijuana-associate deaths, than only 24 were "preventable" — implying the bulk of them would have happened with or without the association of marijuana or other substances.

On page 40 of the 2013 study, the definition of "associated" in this context is explained:

"Although substance use is a known risk factor in child fatalities, it is important to remember the term associated is used because it is not always clear if or how the substance use had a direct or contributing effect on the fatality incident.

"The CFR program defines substance use as associated with a child’s death if the child, the child’s parent, caretaker and/or if the person responsible for the death, during or about the time of the incident leading to the death, used or abused substances, including illegal drugs, prescription drugs, and/or alcohol."

The disclaimer means that the state DHS is not going as far to say that marijuana was a contributing factor — either as a direct or indirect cause — in any of the 62 marijuana-associated deaths.

Another disclaimer in the study states that "more than one substance may have been associated with a single death." That, Cunningham agrees, means that it's possible all of the 62 marijuana-associated deaths were also associated with alcohol or other drugs.

Yet lumping two or more substances into these "associated" statistics results in bias against marijuana, which does not cause toxic overdoses like alcohol and the other drugs. Cunningham acknowledged that substances that were a "cause" of death were also noted as substances "associated" in deaths in this part of the study.

To give a hypothetical example, if a teenager died from ingesting too much meth or alcohol yet also had THC in their blood, that would count in the study as a marijuana-associated death as well as a meth- and alcohol-related death.

THC, the primary psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, is known to be detectable in people for days or weeks after its last use, unlike far-more dangerous drugs that can result in outright death from overdose. That would also tend to skew the results of the study, clearly.

Not to say that nothing could count as a marijuana-associated death. If a toddler dies in a pool while mom is smoking marijuana in a back bedroom, losing track of time, that could be an association that even legalization advocates might acknowledge as valid.

How many of the 62 associations are strong, how many are weak, how many involve multiple substances with true overdose potential, how many were preventable, or any specific info about the associations in any of the cases — those are things the state DHS cannot tell the public due to privacy laws.

"Safe pot?"

The 2013 Child Fatality Review doesn't actually answer that question.

Source

Safe pot? Tell that to the 62 kids who died

Sheila Polk, AZ I See It 2:29 p.m. MST June 15, 2015

Marijuana is an addictive and hazardous drug. But lately, some have taken to proclaiming that "marijuana is safer than alcohol," a message that is not only wrong but dangerous.

According to the Arizona Department of Health Services, in a study that examines all deaths in Arizona of children under the age of 18, a disturbing number of child deaths resulted from substance use. It was linked to the deaths of 128 of Arizona's children in 2013.

Guess which substance was the most prevalent? Not alcohol, not methamphetamine (although they were close seconds), but marijuana. In 2013, marijuana use was associated with the tragic and needless deaths of 62 children in Arizona.

The point is this: Prevention, not legalization, remains the best model for addressing drug abuse. Approximately 7.5 percent of Americans regularly use marijuana while 52 percent use alcohol, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Why raise the first number to the second?

Marijuana today is far more potent than decades past. It poses significant and real threats to the development of the adolescent brain, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

It negatively impacts memory, learning, attention and reaction time — basic skills for our students — and its effects linger even after the intoxication is gone. Research concludes that marijuana use causes a loss of up to eight IQ points in those who start young and use it over the long term.

Legalization of marijuana means more kids will use it. Colorado, where the reckless experiment with legal retail marijuana is unfolding, has seen its youth use rate skyrocket. Colorado students ages 12 to 17 use marijuana at a rate that is 38 percent higher than the national average. While the rest of the country saw a slight increase (less than half a percent) in use of marijuana by folks ages 12 and older from 2012-13, Colorado's rate jumped 22 percent.

Increased availability of a mind-altering drug plays an extremely important role in addiction and poor academic outcomes. Teens who use marijuana are significantly less likely to graduate from high school, are much more likely to use other illicit drugs, and sadly, face increased odds of suicide attempts, according to a September 2014 article in The Lancet Psychiatry. Sheila Polk is the Yavapai County Attorney and vice

The marijuana lobby argues that their plan is to legalize marijuana only for adults, just like alcohol. But consider how that has worked out for our youth and society. Arizona teens regularly use alcohol at almost twice the rate of marijuana. Legalization of a substance generates availability, acceptability and increased use.

To argue that marijuana should be treated more like alcohol is a failure of logic. According to one recent study, the annual cost to taxpayers for health care and crime based on excessive alcohol consumption was $94.2 billion. These billions of dollars do not include the intangible costs of the turmoil inflicted by the user on children, families and neighborhoods.

Legalizing an addictive drug that is linked to child abuse and neglect, increased psychosis and suicidal ideations, lowered IQ, memory loss, impaired learning, poor attention, and academic failure means more damaged lives and lost opportunities for our youth.

Arizona need be in no rush to go down this hole. Four other states have embarked on this experiment; let's watch them and examine their data.

It is unconscionable to experiment with legalization on Arizona's youth. Those 62 children whose lives were snuffed out in 2013 would certainly agree.

Sheila Polk is the Yavapai County Attorney and vice chair of Arizonans for Responsible Drug Policy.

Source

Did marijuana actually kill 62 kids in Arizona? Or...

EJ Montini, The Republic | azcentral.com 3:20 p.m. MST June 17, 2015

Just how deadly a killer is marijuana? Not a single person has ever died from a weed overdose.

According to one frequently cited study, a marijuana smoker would have to consume 20,000 to 40,000 times

If you happened to read a guest editorial in Tuesday's Arizona Republic by Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk you might have come away believing that marijuana use killed 62 kids in Arizona in 2013.

Polk has no real proof of that, of course, hedging her bets with the word "associated." It's good work. But all her essay proves is that Polk wants to be like … me.

The Yavapai prosecutor is serving as vice chairwoman of Arizonans for Responsible Drug Policy, and is doing everything she can to make the case against marijuana legalization. She's not making that argument in a hall of justice, however, but in the court of public opinion, where (as I well know) a bland set of facts can be made palatable with a heaping helping of spiced baloney.

In her essay, for example, Polk writes, "In 2013, marijuana use was associated with the tragic and needless deaths of 62 children in Arizona."

Wow. That's a pretty startling figure. I mean, if marijuana killed 62 kids don't you think that might have made, you know, the news?

Here's the deal. Polk is using as a reference a report by the Arizona Child Fatality Review Program. The report notes that 811 children under 18 died in Arizona in 2013. How they died is then broken down. Mistreatment. Prematurity. Drowning. Firearms. Motor Vehicles. And so on. The report also notes the number of kids whose deaths had some relation to drugs.

It says, "The CFR program defines substance use as associated with a child's death if the child, the child's parent, caretaker and/or if the person responsible for the death, during or about the time of the incident leading to the death, used or abused substances, including illegal drugs, prescription drugs, and/or alcohol."

So, it's not necessarily a child who is using the drugs. And it's often a combination of substances. That's why Polk says marijuana is "associated" with 62 deaths.

What does "associated" mean?

According to the report, "Although substance use is a known risk factor in child fatalities, it is important to remember the term associated is used because it is not always clear if or how the substance use had a direct or contributing effect on the fatality incident."

So, maybe the drug contributed, maybe it didn't. Not the kind of evidence Polk would present in a courtroom.

The report adds, "Although there was a rise in associated marijuana use over alcohol in 2013, this may not be indicative of a new trend as the reported percentages of these two substances fluctuate from year to year. It was also usually a combination of some of these substances and not just one, which played a part in the fatality incident."

What? We can't totally trust the numbers? Again, not exactly courtroom-worthy evidence.

Polk concludes her essay, "It is unconscionable to experiment with legalization on Arizona's youth. Those 62 children whose lives were snuffed out in 2013 would certainly agree."

So, not only can those who are opposed to marijuana legalization fiddle with the facts, they can also speak for the dead?

And I thought it was stoners who were supposed to lose touch with reality.

Here is a link to the PDF file published by the Arizona Department of Health Services

Link