Homeless in Arizona

I suspect this article about Marijuana Policy Project or MPP isn't really an attempt to legalize marijuana in Arizona, but rather an attempt to give a government monopoly of growing and selling recreational marijuana to the members of Andrew Myers, Arizona Dispensary Association or Arizona Association of Dispensaries.

If you read thru Prop 203, which I am told was written by Andrew Myers and the folks at Marijuana Policy Project or MPP it looks like a government welfare program that gives an almost virtual monopoly on growing and selling medical marijuana to the members of Andrew Myers, Arizona Dispensary Association.

Prop 203 is Arizona's Medical Marijuana Act.

Currently per Prop 203 and according to the Arizona Department of Health Services July or September medical marijuana newsletter, less then 4 percent of the medical marijuana users are allowed to grow their own marijuana because of the 25 mile rule.

Here are a could of quotes from the article which lead me to think this.

"the Arizona initiative would be modeled closely on a previous movement in Colorado"

"The Marijuana Policy Project's Tvert said existing medical dispensaries could have first dibs on selling recreational products"

Source

Marijuana Policy Project calls for legal recreational marijuana in Arizona

Lauren Loftus, Cronkite News 10:53 p.m. MST November 2, 2014

Arizona proposal would separate medical, recreational businesses

The people who brought medical marijuana to Arizona four years ago now want marijuana legal for everyone over the age of 21.

The Marijuana Policy Project has filed paperwork with state election officials to form a committee to begin raising funds for a 2016 citizens initiative to legalize recreational marijuana use. Arizona voters narrowly passed Proposition 203 allowing medical cannabis use in 2010.

Communications Director Mason Tvert said the group has plenty of support in Arizona despite the state's traditionally conservative voting patterns.

"It appears most Arizona voters are ready to adopt a more sensible policy," he said. "There were a large number of supporters who got on board (in 2010) and are ready to move forward."

Tvert said the Arizona initiative would be modeled closely on a previous movement in Colorado, which became the first state to legalize recreational marijuana in 2012. Washington was a close second.

According to Tvert, the medical-marijuana business here needn't worry about losing its 52,000 registered cardholders. Like Colorado, there would likely be a differentiation in the medical and recreational business models.

First, only people 21 and older could purchase recreational weed. In both Arizona and Colorado, the threshold for a medical card is 18 years old. Those under 18 can obtain a medical card if their legal guardian is their designated caregiver.

There could also be a marked difference in pricing.

In Colorado, recreational shoppers pay nearly 13 percent in general and special state sales tax, plus a 15 percent excise tax at the wholesale level. Meanwhile, medical cardholders pay the 2.9 percent state sales tax and any local taxes.

Dispensaries for recreational and medical marijuana are kept completely separate, even if the same owner operates both. Tvert said this separation, as well as the different tax rates, keeps existing medical-card holders from flocking to the recreational dispensaries en masse.

"If you went into a business in Colorado that was doing both and said, 'I want Product A, but it's only on the medical side,' then you can't get it if you don't have a license," he said.

Sarah Philyaw, a manager at Arizona Organix in Glendale, one of the first medical dispensaries to open in the state, said she would definitely welcome recreational sellers to the fold, even if it meant more competition.

She said one way to differentiate the two business models would be to sell specific strains and products to medical cardholders and recreational users, as Colorado does.

One of the more popular medical products at Arizona Organix, Philyaw said, is a CBD, or cannabidiol, tincture.

The sublingual oil doesn't contain THC, the main psychoactive property of cannabis.

"We have patients that buy the bottles for anxiety. They feel a decrease in anxiety and there's other benefits," she said. "It's comparable to taking a vitamin C pill."

Not everyone sees marijuana as so harmless.

The Arizona County Attorney and Sheriff's Association signed a resolution in July opposing full legalization, citing various detrimental effects of marijuana use.

"It is demotivating, it hurts student achievement, it creates additional crime," said David Leibowitz, spokesman for the Arizona Association of Counties. [Rubbish, the reason the cops and prosecutors hate it, is because it cuts into the "War on Drugs" which is a jobs program for cops and a government welfare program for police departments]

The resolution was sponsored by MATFORCE, an organization aimed at reducing substance abuse in Yavapai County and statewide.

Executive Director Merilee Fowler said there is a lot of misinformation about marijuana use, particularly among young people.

"In kids' minds, when you say that something is legal, the perception of risk goes down and youth use goes up," she said.

Fowler also pointed to teens abusing legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco.

"Why would we want to add a third legal substance that's going to cost our nation?" she asked. [To be honest that is a direct LIE. If marijuana it legalized we won't be paying cops to arrest and jail people who commit the victimless crime of using marijuana]

State Rep. Ethan Orr, R-Tucson, disagreed with the perception that minors would be more likely to use marijuana if it were legalized. [This skips over the fact that despite the fact marijuana is illegal, millions of people use it]

"I believe it's actually less likely to get in the hands of the minor because the people (licensed dispensaries) that are supplying it have an incentive to work with the state because they want to keep their license," he said.

Orr, who is planning to introduce a proposal of his own to legalize recreational marijuana before the state Legislature next year, said one only has to look at Colorado to see the benefits of legalization.

"I think once they're stabilized, they'll be making $100 to $150 million in tax revenue now that they've overcome some of the federal barriers," he said. "In addition, I think that by decriminalizing it, you're going to save $75 to $100 million within your criminal-justice system." [Sadly the politicians want to legalize marijuana for the wrong reasons. They should want to legalize it because the laws making marijuana are unjust, unfair and the punishment is draconian for a victimless crime. Of course the reason the politicians want to legalize pot is for the cold hard CASH it will bring to them.]

Orr said that extra money could then be funneled back into law enforcement, education and possibly tax cuts.

Orr said he also favors a dual-track system that allows medical dispensaries to continue operating independently of the recreational side.

The Marijuana Policy Project's Tvert said if recreational use passes in Arizona, existing medical dispensaries could have first dibs on selling recreational products as long as the inventories were kept separate. [Which makes my point. The folks at MPP want to give the current medical marijuana dispensaries a government monopoly on growing and selling both RECREATIONAL and MEDICAL marijuana. I.e. the members of Andrew Myers Arizona Dispensary Association]

"Those businesses have established themselves and demonstrated they're willing and able to follow the law," he said. "It certainly makes sense to let those businesses be among the first to start providing marijuana to adults if the initiative passes." [Again, this makes my point. The folks at MPP want to give the current medical marijuana dispensaries a government monopoly on growing and selling both RECREATIONAL and MEDICAL marijuana. I.e. the members of Andrew Myers Arizona Dispensary Association]

Whatever happens with Arizona's marijuana business, Tvert said the initiative coalition will be sensitive to local needs. [Yea, that's like Hitler saying he is sensitive to the needs of the Jewish folks. If you ask me base on past events this sounds like the only folks the people at MPP want to benefit are members of Andrew Myers Arizona Dispensary Association.]

"It will constantly evolve," he said. "It will be, 'This is what we believe is the best possible policy right now.'"